On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 09:53 -0500, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 12:49 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 10:50 +0200, Oliver Falk wrote: > > > A question; Before I open BZ... Is the kernel team (I see Dave Jones is > > > doin' much; that's why CC:) willing to help AlphaCore and add patches to > > > kernel spec? > > > > > > No, it's nothing for upstream. Just fixes for the spec. Some > > > if(n)arch's, sections for alpha, a config, ... Nothing that should break > > > primary archs... > > > > We don't like ifarches. Why? > > The utrace patch is the biggest concern here, really. Not that it's bad > code, but its a significant divergence from upstream, and it doesn't > work on sparc32 (and presumably, alpha). Aurora is %ifarch > conditionalizing that patch (and one later patch that has to be modified > slightly for the old ptrace behavior) in our kernels as well. Does it apply? Seems there's a config option for it... you could just leave that disabled in your .configs. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
