On 5/9/07, Tom spot Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 11:01 -0400, Michael Wiktowy wrote: > Just seeking some clarity why not doing the right thing is the right > thing to do. It was the attempt to say "Keeping Conflicts for old packages that don't exist anymore, and are not really plausible to come up in an upgrade scenario isn't necessary." Conflicts are one more thing that yum has to parse when performing package installs/upgrades, and anywhere we can make yum's job easier, I wholeheartedly endorse. :)
OK ... that makes a lot of sense ... but that isn't what you wrote in the guidelines :] Thanks for clarifying. /Mike -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
