Re: [Guidelines Change] Conflicts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/9/07, Tom spot Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 11:01 -0400, Michael Wiktowy wrote:

> Just seeking some clarity why not doing the right thing is the right
> thing to do.

It was the attempt to say "Keeping Conflicts for old packages that don't
exist anymore, and are not really plausible to come up in an upgrade
scenario isn't necessary."

Conflicts are one more thing that yum has to parse when performing
package installs/upgrades, and anywhere we can make yum's job easier, I
wholeheartedly endorse. :)

OK ... that makes a lot of sense ... but that isn't what you wrote in
the guidelines :]
Thanks for clarifying.

/Mike

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux