Le mercredi 09 mai 2007 à 18:11 +0200, Ralf Corsepius a écrit : > On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 09:48 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 16:50 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > > Le Mer 9 mai 2007 14:12, David Woodhouse a écrit : > > > > The latest clash is people trying to ignore Core rules and apply Extra > > > practices to a Core component. Obviously there needs to be some sort > > > of convergence to avoid new incidents > > > > Yes. Merging is a two way street, so some adaptations will be required > > on both sides. > Don't you think we already have done? ... > The actual development model hasn't changed. It's still "RH vs. > community". I think I've been careful enough to point out the boundary was not Core/Extras or RH/Community but is within Extras, as the former FE never managed to reach internal consensus. Even EPEL separation in a sister project seems to have been driven more by RH & Centos requests than by clear shared organisational vision within FE. There can't be a development model clash between Core and Extras when Extras has no structured development model to clash with (individual Extra packagers have their own development models, with a large variance). While this avoids explicit disagreements it also makes managing users/new packagers/outsiders expectations harder. -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
