Hans de Goede schrieb: > Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> On 09.05.2007 14:45, David Woodhouse wrote: >>> How about a tracker bug for each SIG? >> Well, we never defined in more detail how Packaging SIGs should work. >> Maybe we should create a small set of guidelines that all SIGs follow, >> to get such questions answered once and for all and a common "look and >> feel". I think we should do that, but don't care enough to do it myself >> ATM. And we'll get the usual yelling "to much bureaucracy" or "that's >> should be the decision of the SIG itself" of course... ;-) > A tracker bug sounds like a good idea actually, other then that not too much > rules please. (/me starts yelling: "to much bureaucracy"). Seriously, the Games > SIG works well, really well if you ask me, Well, you mentioning the Games SIG got me to this: We IMHO need guidelines for proper communication so non-SIG-Members are at least a roughly aware of doings and decisions from the SIG. Because that's what IMHO a big problem with the Games SIG. I'm subscribed to a whole lot of fedora mailing lists, but I did not subscribe to fedora-games-list. But as I package games even I would like to know at least the most important things the Games SIG does or decides -- changes to the games specific "Packaging guidelines" for example or even a "we still exists, are healthy and got xyz new games into Fedora in the past weeks" now and then. IOW: A *short* monthly status mail to fedora-maintainers would be nice; such posts would likely get included in the FWN. So that way you not only keep non-SIG members up2date about the happenings; you also get publicity and maybe find new packagers to join the SIG. > but I wouldn't want to make what we > do compulsory for other SIGs. Like wise I know the KDE SIG has weekly IRC > meetings, if that works for them fine, but it doesn't sound like something > which I envision the Games SIG doing soon. Agreed. > But as said a tracker bug, where SIG people can put themselves in the CC, and > where packagers needing help can add there bug, sounds like a good, clean and > simple plan. This same bug could be used by bug reporters who think a bug > warrants the SIG's attention. +1 CU thl -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
