Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Mon, 07 May 2007 13:53:26 -0600, Jonathan Steffan wrote: > > >> Michael Schwendt wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 07 May 2007 10:55:08 -0500, David G. Mackay wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 19:40 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> There is no zope and no plone for Fedora 7. We've removed the rpms from >>>>> the development repository some time ago on the package owner's request. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Sorry to hear that they were removed. If you need the functionality >>>> provided by Zope, then I don't know of any other open source product >>>> that comes close. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> You refer to the old builds for Fedora 6, which have continued to >>>>> live in the development repo for some time. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> I refer to the rpms that were on the F7-t3 dvd. >>>> >>>> >>> Yes, an old FC-6 zope from Aug 30th, 2006, and older than the current FC-6 >>> package. The spec in Fedora Extras CVS has not been touched since then. >>> >>> >> It wouldn't build. Why should I update it? (I actually asked and was >> told it was a waste of my time) >> > > Why would you keep and offer old builds which don't work? > I'm sorry. I am new to the Fedora infrastructure. I didn't know what to do right away. I requested the remove when it was addressed to me. I half hoped there would be a solution that would not require me to remove the builds. Anyways, they are removed. > My initial reply was about this: > > | It was nice to see that zope is one of the packages available for > | installation in F7. > > The old builds ought to have been removed before the release of F7T1. > Yes, I'm sorry I didn't promptly give up on things. > Both zope and plone have been in the broken upgrade paths report for a > long time without that FESCo has been made aware of the problem with > Python 2.5. > FESCo would have been notified at the same time I was... At lest I had expected. This might be a flawed assumption on my part. Extras Rawhide-in-Mock Build Results for x86_64 Sat Feb 3 07:41:25 CST 2007 is the first I was aware of the possible issue, other then my devel branch not building. It was directly requested I removed the packages on April 10th. After trying to get compat packages included I gave up and finally requested the removal. > Further, do the release notes cover the removal yet? > (searching the Wiki I don't think they do) > I don't personally know. I don't think it will make it into the on-image release notes but I would expect something to be added to the wiki? Jonathan Steffan -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
