Gérard Milmeister wrote: > On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 21:03 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: >> I got looking into this because of these review requests: >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235804 >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235805 >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235815 >> >> And I've come to the conclusion that we need some kinda ocaml >> packaging guidelines. >> >> Interesting with regards to this are: >> http://docs.pld-linux.org/ocaml.html >> http://pkg-ocaml-maint.alioth.debian.org/ocaml_packaging_policy.txt > > Maybe you could start an add something to the fedoraproject wiki, for > example a Ocaml SIG. There has also been some interest in this by > Richard Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx>. I think an SIG would be useful, not only to develop standards, but also to improve the general quality of ocaml based packages in Fedora. It'd also be useful to coordinate changes like emulating w.r.t policy if needed (as Richard points out), and deciding on items like how documentation should be presented. N.J. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
