Re: about maintainers and packagemonkeys (was: Re: rpms/ocsinventory-client/devel ocsinventory-client.spec, 1.7, 1.8)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



P.S.:Packagemonkey sounds bad and we should not use the term IMHO.

Totally agreed, everything about that term is negative, and it does
nothing but convey contempt for people's valued contributions. If I
were just looking through the mailing lists archives and considering
contributing to Fedora in some way, and saw contributers referred to
as "package monkeys", I wouldn't hang around long. I find the word,
and the attitude it conveys quite offensive.

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux