2007/4/30, dragoran dragoran <drago01@xxxxxxxxx>:
Hmm, guess I'm one of the few that actually prefer them to the original icons? It's really nice that the icons are the same regardless of which protocol a contact is on. And the icon theme blends quite well with the Tango iconset (I made sure I have as little of OpenOffice installed as possible, since there are no Tango icons for them yet, and the upstream icons are .. uh.
On 4/30/07, Josh Boyer < jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 21:01 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Adam Jackson wrote:
> > On Sun, 2007-04-29 at 08:21 -0500, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> >> On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 05:36 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 12:18 +1000, David Hunter wrote:
> >>>> Since the demise of Gaim being replaced with pidgin, many of the old
> >>>> Icons from gaim have been changed. Any way to get them back? or is it
> >>>> a change for good? Is it a bug or known issue?
> >>> As I understand it, the icons included with pidgin are _the_ icons for
> >>> the package now. I don't think it's a bug.
> >> Unfortunately they're hideous. Does anyone know of a slightly less
> >> horrible icon set for pidgin?
> >
> > There was a nice set in this other IM program. G-something, I think.
>
> Gossip?
I believe Adam was making a tounge-in-cheek reference to Gaim...
I also don't like them... the gaim ones where much better imho...
Hmm, guess I'm one of the few that actually prefer them to the original icons? It's really nice that the icons are the same regardless of which protocol a contact is on. And the icon theme blends quite well with the Tango iconset (I made sure I have as little of OpenOffice installed as possible, since there are no Tango icons for them yet, and the upstream icons are .. uh.
--
Michel Salim
http://hircus.wordpress.com/
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list