Re: repotag in EPEL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Fernando Lopez-Lezcano schrieb:
> [...]
> AFAIK repotags have not caused technical
> problems when used, they _have_ been useful, and they work now. 

repotags are part of the release and as such they influence the
version-comparison when rpm determinates which rpm package is the
newest. Some people call that a "technical problem".

In other words: the repo with the "highest" repotag wins:

[thl@notebook ~]$ rpmdev-vercmp 0 1.1 5 0 1.1 5.at
0:1.1-5.at is newer
[thl@notebook ~]$ rpmdev-vercmp 0 1.1 5.at 0 1.1 5.epel
0:1.1-5.epel is newer
[thl@notebook ~]$ rpmdev-vercmp 0 1.1 5.epel 0 1.1 5.rf
0:1.1-5.rf is newer
[thl@notebook ~]$ rpmdev-vercmp 0 1.1 5.rf 0 1.1 5.zzzzzzzzzz
0:1.1-5.zzzzzzzzzz is newer

> [...]

CU
thl

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux