Jesse Keating wrote:
On Monday 30 April 2007 07:54:16 Rahul Sundaram wrote:
I already told you. This reasoning is flawed. The KDE live cd is not one
to showcase a "pure KDE desktop" just the GNOME live cd. It has Firefox
as the default browser just like GNOME. It has dozens of GNOME
components. It might even have Evolution.
And yet it is specifically KDE, while the Fedora Live CD is specifically....
Fedora.
And you don't consider KDE to be part of Fedora? KDE Live is mostly KDE
programs and some GNOME, some GTK and other programs just like GNOME
live cd. It has never been about purity of the desktop environment. Just
different focus. Both of the desktop environments are part of Fedora.
The GNOME live images are not anymore specifically about Fedora than the
KDE live images.
The Desktop environment that Fedora wants to put forward as the
default, the best foot forward.
No. It's the desktop environment the GNOME team should be putting it's
best foot forward. The KDE team should be putting it's best foot forward
via the KDE live images (same for XFCE or fluxbox or whatever teams) and
we in the Fedora project should be giving both these teams *neutral
ground* to compete aggressively and fairly on winning over new users.
Rahul
PS: I am mostly using GNOME. This isn't my bias.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
