Ralf Corsepius wrote:
.
The only legitimate reason to patch is time-lags between upstream and
current version.
Not true. There are licensing reasons, difference in defaults,
differences in approaches between upstream and distributions etc.
If this isn't reason, then patching is a strong indication for something
about the development model not being functional.
It could also be indicative of that. Encouraging patches to be submitted
upstream is a good thing but the number of patches are not indicated as
a review blocker and won't stop a package from being included in Fedora.
Rahul
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
