On Saturday 28 April 2007 09:40:40 eric wrote:
> Just a small question: Regarding SRPMS directory structure beneath
> "updates", is there a reason why it is NOT placed under "source"
> directory ("updates/6/SRPMS" instead of "updates/6/source/SRPMS")
> like those of "development" and "release" tree structures
> ("development/source/SRPMS" and "6/source/SRPMS")?
Mostly because the use of source/SRPMS in the other locations is because we
also have isos of source so there is source/iso and source/SRPMS. We could
use the same structure, but there would be no iso/ directory so it seemed odd
to have another directory level with nothing in it.
--
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgpKATlQAKOmb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
