Josh Boyer schrieb: > On Sat, 2007-04-28 at 14:04 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: >> On Sat, 2007-04-28 at 13:26 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >>>> Not sure what sub-titles I'd choose. Something that indicates the >>>> essential information about 'core' vs 'extra', I suppose. >>>> Anyone got any ideas? >>> Fedora Repo N -> repository with all the packages >>> Fedora Linux N -> the Linux Distribution that was known as Prime >> Hm, I don't think 'Linux' really conveys the information that these are >> the _core_ packages on the install media, rather than the extra stuff >> you might install later from the network (or extra DVDs or whatever). >> I suppose 'Repo' is a little more suited to its task, but the core stuff >> is still in a repository on the install media (and elsewhere) too, so >> that name isn't ideal either. >> >> We really want some names which convey the distinction between the Core >> stuff and the Extra bits. As jwb wrote: each spin has a different "core" set... And, btw, Users IMHO should not care where the packages come from. >Got any better ideas? No. Well, maybe something else shows up. > No, we don't. The Core stuff and Extra bits are intermingled between > spins. It varies. And there's the Everything spin. > > Naming sucks. Agreed -- but referencing three things (Repo as a whole, the Distro that gets made from the Repo and the Project itself) under the name "Fedora" sucks even more IMHO and just creates confusion ;-) Cu thl -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
