>>>>> "RS" == Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: RS> If no one is interested in reviewing a package for years together RS> then it is just hogging up the queue without the benefits. I wasn't aware that there was some limit on the queue size. RS> If a package has been submitted over say 6 months back then that RS> submission is useless is most cases since newer software would RS> have been released that makes the software as well as associated RS> reviews obsolete. This is far from true in many circumstances. What we have now works fine; I haven't noticed the people who review the packages complaining about the submissions. Anyone is welcome to drop pings on those old reviews to make sure the submitters are still around. However, you can't really expect them to provide updates unless there's some chance that someone will actually review the packages, so it would be preferable if such pings come with an offer to review. This is what I do. (And really, I do intend to start reviewing again soon.) - J< -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
