-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Patrice Dumas wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 12:49:24PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >>> Patrice Dumas wrote: >>> >>> Currently the review queue >>>> is quite big because all the package formerly in core has to be >>>> reviewed. But even before the merge review there were reviews that were >>>> some years old. >>> Do we really have reviews stalled for years? We should probably have >>> a policy in place that reviews over a few months get closed. >> >> >> Why? We have the stalled review policy that covers this subject fine, in >> my opinion. And yes I have at least months old or years submissions but I >> can't see why they should be closed. Same for submissions I am reviewing >> and that are stuck for whatever reason. > > If no one is interested in reviewing a package for years together then > it is just hogging up the queue without the benefits. If a package has > been submitted over say 6 months back then that submission is useless is > most cases since newer software would have been released that makes the > software as well as associated reviews obsolete. A submitted review, can be held up due to other dependencies that continuously get added, or because of the continued great work of maintainers (and reviewers alike), that are working well on bettering themselves at packaging and insuring Fedora keeps to a reasonable minimum standard, while proceeding through the review process. 'Good things take time' - -- N.J. > > Rahul > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGMauDpldg9bRmG6kRAuj3AKCBVNDGBiy1VinacqEuR3F2rRtVZACdE20s cryTpAup1fk4bDRQvzwV+VY= =Hx5t -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
