Bruno Wolff III (bruno@xxxxxxxx) said: > I think there had been an assumption that this person had been watching > the bugzilla entry for encrypted file systems and would include patches > posted there once people reported they were working OK. That assumption seems > to have been incorrect. The patches, as posted, are broken: - they introduce a new configuration file when mkinitrd already has one - they hardcode device names in the exact same way that /etc/crypttab does, meaning that it will fail in the exact same way with hotplugged drives or device ordering changes that /etc/crypttab does (and does with a vengeance in any FC6 -> F7 upgrade). Considering this is the root device, that's *bad*. Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
