Hi, On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 11:50:34AM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > cyrus-imapd-devel contains two static libs and headers. > > cyrus-imapd contains no shared libs, but only executables. > > So, the -devel package need not require the main package. > But I'm going to exclude cyrus-imapd-devel from multilib > nevertheless for now. Should I remove the require then? Is this "need not" meant as "should not" or is it just "the problem wouldn't have happened if it hadn't been there, but ..." ? I haven't found any conclusion in the "broken deps outside of packagers control" discussion on fedora-maintainers, so I'm not sure what to do. It's not a big issue here becuase I don't have to split anything into a -libs subpackage, but I saw a statement like "as a good -devel subpackage, it properly requires its base package", so I'm kinda confused right now. -- TJ. (Brno, CZ), BaseOS, Red Hat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
