On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 09:34:18 -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote: > On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 11:42 +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 07:10 +0000, Fedora Extras repoclosure wrote: > > > package: uqm - 0.6.2-1.fc7.i386 from fedora-extras-development-i386 > > > unresolved deps: > > > libmikmod.so.2 > > > > these packages need to be rebuilt because of the recent update of mikmod > > (increased libmikmod soname): > > Updating mikmod (and to a beta, not even a full release!) after the > feature freeze seems like a bad idea. What's the compelling reason that > we shouldn't revert this change? If it will be reverted, we should make sure no Extras rebuilds, which have been done meanwhile, are pushed. One is in needsign already. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
