Am Wed, 18 Apr 2007 16:45:04 -0500 schrieb Steven Pritchard <steve@xxxxxxxxx>: > On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 11:33:46PM +0200, Sebastian Vahl wrote: > > So the question here is: Are there good reasons for choosing > > qtparted instead of gparted? Or is gtparted equal in functionality? > > I'd think sticking with qtparted to get a common(-ish) look & feel > would be best. Don't think it's common look (maybe feel). It's pure qt :) http://qtparted.sourceforge.net/screenshots.en.html > > BTW, could someone verify that ntfs resizing actually works in the > current Fedora qtparted? It *should* be enabled, but I haven't had a > chance to actually try it yet... That's the background for this: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234082 And we've also decided to include them. But when resizing ntfs is not working with qtparted, gparted would be the only choice. Sebastian
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
