On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 18:11 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote: > On Wednesday 18 April 2007, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > > > > The trivial fix (BuildRequires: perl-devel) is, well, trivial. The > > proper fix is to actually require the modules that the package needs > > to build, > > Right. > > > which is usually perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) is easy but not > > completely trivial. > > Looking at 5.8.8-16 in CVS, neither perl-devel nor perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) > is sufficient for the majority of cases. perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker should most > likely pull in perl(Test::Harness) (see the perl review bug in Bugzilla), but > in addition to that a lot of packages would need to have an explicit > perl(Test::More) build dependency added, that's commonly used in ./test.pl > and/or t/*.t in CPAN distributions. > > There are also some Epoch issues in 5.8.8-16 which makes some of its > subpackages uninstallable, hopefully a fix will arrive soon. Absolutely we urgently need a *-17 with the bugs fixes. This *-16 can't and won't fly (IMNSHO this is a RELEASE BLOCKER) Ralf -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
