Including gnubg, which does in fact have a bug filed, which depends on a gnuplot bug that has been unaddressed since it was filed 3/20/07. . . </gripe> > On Tuesday 17 April 2007 00:55:51 Matt Domsch wrote: >> no worries. I can just requeue the failed jobs; a few hundred >> packages is nothing compared to the >4k packages it just crunched. >> The bug wouldn't have produced false positives (jobs that succeeded >> but shouldn't have), yes? > > Correct, it should only have triggered false negatives. > > -- > Jesse Keating > Release Engineer: Fedora > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list -- novus ordo absurdum -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
