Christopher Aillon <caillon@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> I do not see how this matters here. rpm knows enough ways to handle it: >> * explicit 'Requires: firefox = ...' in binary plugins > > Packagers fall all too easily into the trap of >= and not updating the > min/max versions It should be more or less trivial to write an rpmlint check which catches 'Requires: firefox >= ...'. A fedora packaging guideline for firefox plugins can forbid this too. Enrico
Attachment:
pgp05vYVT62u9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
