On 4/13/07, Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Vlad wrote: > Fedora's attitude seems to be: Forget KDE distro integration, we're > not going to bother. imo, there much more to KDE distro integration than (re)writing qt/kde-based config tools, which could be better spent elsewhere, like: 0. general participation in the kde sig(0) 1. many kde wishlist apps/utilities are in need of package maintainers(1) 2. kde spin could use (lots!) more testing/feedback(2) 3. kde-centric fedora documentation (3) but hey, no one is forbidding anything. If you see other itches, but all means, scratch them! -- Rex (0) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/KDE (1) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/KDE#head-8482e5f52583617ce25a658ff3bc2e5db431d7c6 (2) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureFedoraKDE (3) DocsProject: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject/Goals
Exactly.Rex had just a lot more eloquently stated what I have been trying to say. The system-config tools are really a very small issue. Just go over to kde-(apps|look).org and see how many mor epackages could be in Fedora. -- Fedora Core 6 and proud -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
