On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 12:38 -0400, David Zeuthen wrote: > On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 09:30 -0700, Vlad wrote: > > There are some distro-specific utilities that probably won’t find a > > home in fd.o. Notable examples include the Anaconda installer, package > > manager, > > True. And I noted that later in my mail but you conveniently skipped > that part. > > > X.org configurator, > > Wrong; with xrandr 1.2 this will get fixed and the desktop environments > can ship distro agnostic tool for this. Actually, s-c-d kinda already has this. rhpxl and pyxf86config are already toolkit-agnostic, and in reality, much of the code in s-c-d could move down to rhpxl. I don't have any real incentive to do so though. And I imagine that's true for most of system-config-*. I certainly wouldn't object if someone wanted to do that refactoring, I'd be happy to use the result, but when I examine my list of "things to do someday", it's, well, not near the top. - ajax -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
