On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 16:56 -0600, Cody Tracy wrote: > Arthur Pemberton wrote: > >On 4/12/07, Kelly <lightsolphoenix@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>I'm somewhat interested in the answers to a few questions, after watching > >>some > >>of the discussion on the list. Now, seriously: > > > >>1) Is there sufficient interest in having the system-config packages > >>split > >>into data and GUI components so there might be Qt/KDE versions in the > >>future? > > > >-1 : subjectively wasted time and resources, doubled work, negligible > >benefit > The only area where work would be doubled is in writing the GUI. > The back end should stay the same. There is no reason this couldn't be done. If you or others wish to code something up, go for it. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
