Jesse Keating wrote:
On Wednesday 11 April 2007 14:12:39 Rahul Sundaram wrote:
So let me ask. Who or which team decides this? What about application
defaults or which packages to install by default? Is this supposed to be
handled by release engineering or FESCo?
Good question. In the past it was the "core cabal" who is mostly now on FESCo
as well as the release team, however these two teams have many more people on
them than what was the cabal before.
Should FESCo be the deciding body here? I would like to have a team of
people look at decisions rather than a single person so that we have a
chance of a debate and different outlooks.
I have a suggestion for a package to be installed by default that I
would like to see someone or a team take ownership and give me a
decisive response.
Given that both the bugs you referenced are still in NEW state, I find it
unlikely that we'd be adding this package to the default list in comps.
Perhaps you haven't gotten any responses because the bugs that should be
fixed for its inclusion are not fixed yet.
Actually I did get positive responses from the maintainer, upstream
developer and others. The enhancements are "nice to have" but the
package is still very functional in its current state.
Rahul
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
