Re: Any objection to updating wireless-tools in devel?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 19:04 -0400, Christopher Aillon wrote:
> Dan Williams wrote:
> > It means a bump in the soname of the library, requiring rebuilds of
> > NetworkManager, rhpl, and kdenetwork to name a few.
> 
> My main objection is that it's a beta still.  But I suppose that people 
> in networking never want to make actual releases. 
> *cough*NetworkManager*cough*.

Care to roll 0.6.5 for me? :)  I dare you.

There's not a burning need to rev wireless-tools.  The stupid message is
annoying and there's a problem with leakage of kernel data on 64-bit
kernels with 32-bit userspace or something like that, but that can be
backported I think.  Thoughts?

Dan

> 
> Seriously, though, it would be super if we could convince both of you 
> guys to actually release stuff.  We're now going to ship a beta version 
> of both NM and wireless-tools so what is the point in calling either a beta?
> 
> </rant>
> 

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux