Re: readahead could use a update

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: readahead could use a update
From: Ralf Ertzinger <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 12:49:03 +0200
In-reply-to: <6e24a8e80704110342l5522ed34xf2e319c1d2ba5041@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: [NDC] :)
References: <6e24a8e80704071059p72fd453x382ea4762e56ecbb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070411074137.GS31445@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6e24a8e80704110342l5522ed34xf2e319c1d2ba5041@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

Hi.

On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 12:42:28 +0200, Mark wrote:

> filling up the cache with programs isn`t good

Filling it with programs is what a cache is _for_.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: readahead could use a update
  - From: Mark

References:
- readahead could use a update
  - From: Mark
- Re: readahead could use a update
  - From: Karel Zak
- Re: readahead could use a update
  - From: Mark

Prev by Date: Re: DeltaRPM works great on Fedora Core 6 (yum presto plugin)
Next by Date: Re: Did i just made the fastest dependency checker in the world? (198 packages in 1.5 seconds)
Previous by thread: Re: readahead could use a update
Next by thread: Re: readahead could use a update
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Kernel] [Fedora Testing] [Fedora Formulas] [Fedora PHP Devel] [Kernel Development] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [PAM] [Red Hat Development] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]

Powered by Linux