On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 07:40 -0700, Tom London wrote: > On 4/10/07, Andy Green <andy@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Tom London wrote: > > > > > I can verify that it is not working for ipw3945 on Thinkpad X60 either > > > using NM or manual.... (Fails to associate). > > > > > > Seems to get confused about frequency; reports my .11g out as .11a, etc. > > > > I have seen it show this for iwconfig while it is scanning through all > > the a/b/g channels in the background. > > > > >> From some posts to ipw3945 list, appears there are some patches that > > > put some -Wext functions into the stack..... > > > > > > I've been testing with each new Rawhide kernel, and then reinstalling > > > ipw3945 driver/daemon. > > > > Why don't you try these instead: > > > > http://people.redhat.com/linville/kernels/fc7/ > > > > -Andy > > > OK. Downloaded/installed 2.6.20-1.3048.2.1.fc7.jwltest.7. > > I can associate with non-WEP/non-WPA network (thanks Google!) using > NM, but cannot associate with WEP network. > > I vote for these bits to go into rawhide..... > > tom > -- > Tom London > It also works for me on our mac address protected access points, though I haven't really beat on it yet. I did notice that all wireless signal levels are 100% though. This new driver really improves reception! :-) So I guess the question is, is there a reason for this not to go into rawhide? Thanks, tjb -- ======================================================================= | Thomas Baker email: tjb@xxxxxxx | | Systems Programmer | | Research Computing Center voice: (603) 862-4490 | | University of New Hampshire fax: (603) 862-1761 | | 332 Morse Hall | | Durham, NH 03824 USA http://wintermute.sr.unh.edu/~tjb | ======================================================================= -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
