On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 09:27:39PM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Le lundi 09 avril 2007 à 15:00 -0400, Jesse Keating a écrit : > > On Monday 09 April 2007 14:54:05 Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > > Things that just depend on /usr/sbin/sendmail should use a file dep > > > period. They're no that awful we have to hide them behind virtual deps > > > (which have their own problems, one being no one knows what they stand > > > for) > > > > 'mta' is more than just needing /usr/sbin/sendmail. What it really means is > > that it requires all that the 'mta' alternatives entry provides. > > So, is there a single package providing /usr/sbin/sendmail which is not > "mta" capable esmtp, for example. It provides all the mta alternatives entry, but not all the functionalities. However smtpdaemon is better for a mta that provides all the functionalities behind the mta alternatives (that is send mail, receive mail on the smtp port and deliver mail locally). -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
