On Sun, 2007-04-08 at 13:24 -0500, Michael E Brown wrote: > On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 07:50:53PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > On Sun, 8 Apr 2007 12:15:14 -0500, Michael E Brown wrote: > > > > > Based upon the numerous comments about how firmware-addon-dell > > > should not be noarch, I converted it to arch-specific over the weekend > > > along with some other bugfixes I was making. In the previous thread, > > > somebody had stated that yum would handle this properly. > > > > Yes, it does. > > > > > Well, it turns out that yum will not upgrade a noarch.rpm to > > > arch-specific in FC6, at least, so I am busted. > > > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235632 > > > > Cannot confirm. Works for me. FC6 and Rawhide. > > > > $ rpm -q test > > test-1.0-0.fdr.3.fc7.7 > > $ rpm -q test --qf %{arch}\\n > > noarch > > > > $ sudo yum update > > [...] > > ---> Package test.i386 0:1.0-0.fdr.4.fc7.7 set to be updated > > Checking deps for test.i386 0-1.0-0.fdr.4.fc7.7 - u > > Checking deps for test.noarch 0-1.0-0.fdr.3.fc7.7 - None > > filelists.xml.gz 100% |=========================| 402 B 00:00 > > > > Dependencies Resolved > > > > ============================================================================= > > Package Arch Version Repository Size > > ============================================================================= > > Updating: > > test i386 1.0-0.fdr.4.fc7.7 misc 35 k > > I am wondering if this is just an issue going from .noarch -> x86_64, > because I set up a similar test, and going from noarch->i386 worked > fine, but noarch->x86_64 did not. it shouldn't matter but I'm curious of this: yum list pkgname I'd like to see all the potential updates that are available, please. -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
