Nicolas Mailhot writes: > Le vendredi 06 avril 2007 à 13:45 +0100, Andrew Haley a écrit : > > Nicolas Mailhot writes: > > > Le vendredi 06 avril 2007 à 11:07 +0100, Andrew Haley a écrit : > > > > Nicolas Mailhot writes: > > > > > > > > > > the consensus seems to be it's more efficient to wait for the > > > > > actual Java 7 SUN GPL release than make gcj feature-complete enough > > > > > for JBoss. > > > > > > > > Really? The consensus among whom? I wonder what that's based on. > > > > > > The consensus as expressed by the Fedora Java team on this list in the > > > past > > > > I doubt it. I could only find one posting with the Google query > > site://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/ jboss gcj > > and that was from one "Nicolas Mailhot". > > Then it was on one of the other Linux & Java technical lists > (fedora-maintainers, fedora-extras, fedora-devel-java, > jpackage-discuss@xxxxxxxx). Java team members participate in many > different public forums, and I won't pretend I track each of their > messages. It seems this consensus is rather fleeting. > If you deem gcj ready for JBoss feel free to submit a set of JBoss > packages. I'll be sure to let you know. Andrew. -- Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, UK Registered in England and Wales No. 3798903 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
