Le vendredi 06 avril 2007 à 13:23 +0200, Oliver Falk a écrit : > On 04/06/2007 01:16 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: > > On Friday 06 April 2007 07:07:06 Timothy Spaulding wrote: > >> If that is the case, why not just package Java 7 directly rather than make > >> gcj feature-complete? > > > > Because Java 7 is still not FLOSS enough. > > And when it finally is, it will be funny to build it under ppc, alpha or > s390 :-) Will for sure make a lot of head-aches... But will be very useful for people that don't want to learn the quirks of a new jvm codebase every time they move from one arch to another -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
