John Poelstra wrote: > Jesse Keating said the following on 04/05/2007 01:59 PM Pacific Time: >> On Thursday 05 April 2007 16:47:12 Roland McGrath wrote: >>> The final tree picture on the page shows all of: >>> >>> core/development >>> development >>> extras/development >>> >>> are those supposed to be: >>> >>> core/development -> ../development >>> development >>> extras/development -> ../development >>> >>> ? Or else, what does it mean? We're not going to have both merged and >>> unmerged copies of all the development/ contents on mirrors are we? >> >> For a period of time, the core/development and extras/development >> content will stick around as it was last updated. This will allow >> mirrors to have something to hardlink against for the new merged >> content in linux/development. After a short time, the >> core/development will become a symlink to linux/development as will >> extras/development become a symlink to the same place, for a period of >> time before the directories are expunged all together. > > Why do we need the parent "linux" directory if it only has one child? > Seems to me that getting rid of it would be a nice think like happened > to RPMS on the install disks. Its not an only child. There's also a "projects" directory. It just wasn't relevant to the discussion (or so it seemed ;). -- Jarod Wilson jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
