Re: hal + pam update errors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 01:54:36PM -0400, David Zeuthen wrote:
> > you can't do an arch-specific obsolete. At best it'll grab all of them.
> > and that's at _best_.
> So should I undo the split of hal into hal and hal-libs? Please advise.

The split seems okay; I think hal should just be whitelisted as i386.

Or really, why isn't it automatically picked up because it's required by
firefox.i386 et al?

-- 
Matthew Miller           mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx          <http://mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux      ------>              <http://linux.bu.edu/>

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux