Patrice Dumas schrieb: > [...] > Maybe we need some infrastructure then, even more > importantly for EPEL, were skipping the release should be even more > relevant (as it has been already discussed and I guess this is somewhere > on the wiki). Not sure on this. EPEL has no own devel branch. So when we get closer to RHEL6 we could simply branch all EL-5 packages that are still active in Fedora (e.g. have no dead.packges file) and ask all the owners of new packages to ask manually for a EL-6 branch. Sounds like a easy solution for the problem and makes sure all packages in EPEL6 have a owner. For stuff in the epel-testing repo it might be as easy to request a delete a package shortly before the testing stuff becomes stable with the next quarterly update. That's a bit manual work, but it hopefully should not happen that often. CU thl -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
