Nicolas Antonio Corrarello wrote:
I thought ntfs was non-free because there is a patent associated.
Remember the good ol' friends, the one from Redmond and Novel
If there is a patent question associated with the latest ntfs-3g
sources, MS must declare its patent rights and inform the offending
party/parties to be enforceable. I just look at the source codes, and
all seem to be released under GNU Public License (GPL). So I assumed
nothing there is non-free or it will violate the spirit of GPL.
I think as hardware/software virtualization improved and optimized,
ntfs-3g will be less significant, if not already.
dragoran escribió:
eric magaoay wrote:
Just wondering if it is possible to incorporate this latest stable
version into FC7.
Existing version in repo: ntfs-3g.x86_64 2:1.0-1.fc7
fill a bug (RFE) against ntfs-3g in bugzilla
OK, I will do it upon completion of my test.
eric
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
