On Thursday 29 March 2007 02:53:04 Michael Schwendt wrote: > Adding macro usage without adding the macros to "something like > redhat-rpm-config" is not good. > > Historically, the plan has always been to add the macros to such a > package. Hearing about "resistance" is news to me. > > It is already unexpected and inconvenient enough to need "--define fedora > 6" or similar when rebuilding some packages. I see criticism here for how we use the buildsystem, but I don't see an actual opinion as to making these macros work on the installed system. I assume from your last sentence that you're in favor, but I'd rather not make assumptions. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgpCrdk536GDz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
