Re: hplip: hp-toolbox advertising?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 23:29 -0500, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:

> The Fedora Packaging Guidelines represent the hard work of many
> contributors, both those of Red Hat employees and community members.
> Honestly, your blatant disrespect for both the guidelines drafted and
> approved by the community and the committee which already has a
> thankless job makes me sick.

If you look at the cvs commits, you will find that I move desktop
packages closer to following the guidelines every single day. Saying
that I consider the guidelines as just that, guidelines, not a god-given
scripture is quite something different than "blatant disrespect". 

> Attacking, slandering, and refusing to comply with the guidelines when
> they don't suit you personally sets a _wonderful_ example for Red Hat
> community relations.

Can you point out where I have been attacking and slandering, please ?

This thread started out with calling my a hypocrite, now I am attacking
and slandering. Time to call it a day, I think...

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux