Josh Boyer wrote: > I'd like to point out that there is likely a trademark issue involved > here as well. Unless the package has an explicit grant to display the > HP trademark even if patches are made, I'm sure it'll get sticky. > > That might be a bit easier to swallow than "free advertisement". So, I wonder if we also have a grant to the word "bluetooth" since it's a certification mark? I would guess not. http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=stgctl.2.8 "THE CERTIFICATION MARK CERTIFIES THAT GOODS MANUFACTURED AND SERVICES RENDERED BY AUTHORIZED PERSONS COMPLY WITH THE QUALITY AND/OR INTEROPERABILITY STANDARDS ESTABLISHED BY BLUETOOTH SIG, INC." -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
