Re: xfce - unowned directories?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Dienstag, den 27.03.2007, 11:12 -0600 schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
> On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 23:59:47 +0200
> christoph.wickert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Christoph Wickert) wrote:
> 
> > Am Montag, den 26.03.2007, 20:53 +0200 schrieb Michael Schwendt:
> > > Lost of unowned directories are reported for XFCE packages [1]. If
> > > I were familiar with the dependency graph, I would know where to
> > > start with suggesting fixes:
> > 
> > I think Kevin can give us more insight, this is only what I see on a
> > quick glance.
> 
> Sorry for the delay in looking at this... been busy. ;( 
> 
[snipped]
> 
> I will try and go through all this list tonight and see if I can clean
> all these up. Any additional ideas or issues, let me know.

So where does the dependency of the libs start? If I'm correct it's
        libxfce4util -> libxfcegui4 -> libxfce4mcs.

In this case I think we could make the first one in this chain own the
"basic" dirs like
        %{_libdir}/xfce4
        %{_datadir}/xfce4
and %{_includedir}/xfce4 for the devel package. Or ist there a better
way, especially for %{_datadir}?

I still have no idea what to do with %{_datadir}/xfce4/doc. Ideas?

Christoph

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux