On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 10:16 -0400, David Zeuthen wrote: > On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 11:08 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 06:03 -0400, buildsys@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > hal-0.5.9-0.git20070326.fc7 > > > --------------------------- > > > * Mon Mar 26 2007 David Zeuthen <davidz@xxxxxxxxxx> - > > > 0.5.9-0.git20070326 > > > - Update to hal 0.5.9rc2 and hal-info-20070326 > > > > These *need* to be split into separate SRPMS. I don't mind > > co-maintaining these if you want, but if we are updating machine quirks > > once a month or so, then we should be able to update one 100k no-arch > > package, rather than 4 or 5 multi-megabyte architecture specific > > packages. > > > > Sorry to harp on about this, but F7T3 is getting closer. > > One, this bug is not a feature and that's why I've been punting it since > I'd rather spend my time getting features done before feature freeze. Ahh, I figured it was a new feature, apologies. > Second, the hal and hal-info tarballs needed fixing > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/hal/2007-March/007799.html Yes agreed, cheers for doing this. > to actually sanely do this. Third, I'd be happy to see you co-maintain > the hal-info package and I think I even suggested you should submit the > hal-info SRPM for Fedora Extras. If it's in Extras already, it's simpler > to do the switch once the merge is complete. HAL will need a rebuild > _anyway_ to take advantage of libsmbios for backlight and rfkill on Dell > laptops. Sure, I do enough shouting on this list to put my money where my mouth is... ;-) I'll happily co-maintain hal-info. I'll read up on how to do so tonight. Richard. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
