Re: fedora-maintainers vs fedora-devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mark McLoughlin wrote:

> 	It seems odd to create a boundary (i.e. fedora-maintainers is a closed
> list) between the people currently doing the work and people which might
> potentially do some work. You want to make it easier for people to
> contribute, not harder.

Yes it must be very annoying to have subhuman monkeys on the list, when
everyone knows anything good can only come from $OUR_GROUP.  And of
course once you have an $OUR_GROUP, boundaries are what you like,
because without them, horrors of horrors, people might not be able to
tell if you are a subhuman monkey or not.  Whereas now it's easy to tell
by the unif- I mean which toilets - er... fedora-maintainers membership.

-And

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux