Dave Jones wrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 10:46:04PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
>
>
> Dave Jones wrote:
> > In days of old, changes to the Fedora kernel would typically
> > mean sending me a patch in an email. These days, now that
> > we've got more than one fulltime Fedora kernel maintainer,
> > it's meant I've had to educate people into adding Chuck onto
> > the Cc: when people send me stuff.
> > Rather than have to go through this process each time someone
> > new joins the kernel team, creating a mailing list, and adding
> > more people to a mailing list seems to make more sense.
> >
> > Rather than have another internal @redhat list however, it
> > makes more sense in the interests of openness to make this
> > an external list that *anyone* can subscribe to should they
> > feel motivated to do so.
> >
>
> Agreed, if this is indeed meant to be public you should make the archives
> public too.
Hmm, that's odd. The admin interface showed that set to public.
I'll fiddle it some more. It certainly isn't intentional.
Is it meant for developers or do you want users to come up with bugs or
questions to that list? If it just for the developer coordination
fedora-kernel-devel list is a better name.
Rahul
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
