On 19 Mar 2007, at 10:05, Oliver Falk wrote:
> ntpd, I would let this one. Time synchronization makes sense.
We could use something slimmer than the full ntpd - a client only (s) ntp implementation, say. Maybe openntpd.
Nigel. -- [ Nigel Metheringham Nigel.Metheringham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ] [ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ] -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
