On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 12:26:06PM +0100, Tomas Janousek wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 05:16:26AM +0100, Miloslav Trmac wrote: > > Can anyone see a problem with the plan, or an important feature that the > > above fails to address? > > If I understood it correctly, every locate search would read the files on the > remote volumes, right? The performance will suffer a bit I think. For example, > NFS over 11mbit wifi is fine, but waiting tens of seconds for the database to > download isn't good. Probably a global locate cache db that merges all the > fs-local ones would be nice. Perhaps the remote .mlocatedbs could be cached based on size and timestamp? -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgprYnuRsywPi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
