Tony Nelson wrote: > At 7:52 AM +0100 3/13/07, Aurelien Bompard wrote: >>Neal Becker wrote: >>> This sounds great! I haven't looked at the code yet. >> >>It's pretty trivial, you'll see >> >>> Will it also ignore cases when the new config hasn't actually changed, >>> and >>> silently remove the redundant copy? That would be really great. >> >>If RPM created a copy, it means something has changed. > > One would think so, but no, not always. Vim's rpm is one offender > (retyped): > > # ls /etc/vimrc* > /etc/vimrc /etc/vimrc.rpmnew > # diff /etc/vimrc* timestamp, owner, permissions? -- Rex -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
