Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 07:52:42AM +0100, Aurelien Bompard wrote: >> > Will it also ignore cases when the new config hasn't actually changed, >> > and >> > silently remove the redundant copy? That would be really great. >> >> If RPM created a copy, it means something has changed. The plugin just >> looks for .rpmsave/.rpmnew files (depending if it's a %config or >> a %config(noreplace)) > > Unfortunately rpm creates on multiarch .rpmnew files for configs which > differ only in modification time (see #128622). > > It would be nice to have an additional check implemented in the > plugin to workaround the bug. > Yes, that's what I meant. Please, please. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
