Le Lun 12 mars 2007 17:19, seth vidal a écrit : > I'm getting a little annoyed at this conversation. > > Apparently it is not acceptable for things to be not-working or > less-good in rawhide. Apparently, we have to go from one working state > to another perfectly working state w/o passing through any situation in > which it is not as functional. Seith, There are enough unintentionnal failures in rawhide without piling up intentionnal ones on them (plus we've passed F7T2 now). And developper/tester respect goes both ways. -- Nicolas Mailhot -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list