On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 20:08 -0500, Warren Togami wrote:
> Features have not historically been tracked formally in Fedora.
> Features just would sort of land if they were completed before freeze
> dates. I suppose we could improve this in the future, but is the Wiki
> really the best way to represent this?
Hence the 'fedora_requires_release_note' Bugzilla flag? :)
Is there a formal policy for that like there is for the fedora-cvs one?
If not, then we could simply request that flag ('?') and add a note to
the package's review request (or another resolved RFE bug) stating the
cool new significant feature that has been added/changes. Then perhaps
this can go to the fedora-docs list and someone can approve ('+') the
flag when this is added or deny it ('-') with a brief explanation as to
the reasoning for its denial.
Also, the Docs/Beats on the wiki are writable to all Fedora Account
holders, right? Could setting the flag in Bugzilla automagically add
that note the wiki if the flag requester has a Fedora account/is in the
EditGroup?
Just some random thoughts here; my two cents...
--
Peter Gordon (codergeek42) / FSF Associate Member #5015
GnuPG Public Key ID: 0xFFC19479 / Fingerprint:
DD68 A414 56BD 6368 D957 9666 4268 CB7A FFC1 9479
Blog: http://thecodergeek.com/blog/
About: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PeterGordon
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
